This article is about a VC (Venture Capital) fair at the ATA meeting.
Though it is in context of telemedicine and mHealth, the points and comments are generally applicable to any start-up.
This article is about a VC (Venture Capital) fair at the ATA meeting.
Though it is in context of telemedicine and mHealth, the points and comments are generally applicable to any start-up.
Here is a summary (note: may need to register with site to access) of some RIS (Radiology Information System) innovations that providers should be looking for.
Sneak peek…
I am working on an article on how (and why) RIS and PACS will be deconstructed and will not exist (as we know them today) in the future. Stay tuned for that.
This article describes a “perfect storm” of factors that lead to the health system’s financial loss…
…”the operating loss is due to declines in inpatient and outpatient volumes because of the hospital’s efforts to reduce readmissions and infections; “unintended financial consequences” due to the roll out of the health system’s Epic electronic health record and problems associated with being unable to accurately charge for services provided; an increase in free care and bad debt cases; and continued declining reimbursement from Medicare and MaineCare, the state’s Medicaid program”
This article debates the impact regulation has on innovation.
My 2 cents: Regulation provides consumer protection; standards provide access to data, which often leads to innovation.
More thoughts and notes…
This is an interesting study.
Providing patient pictures were found to significantly improve the Radiologist’s ability to detect that images had been associated with the incorrect patient.
I have heard of the idea of using pictures to ensure the correct patient is involved in a procedure or treatment (when the patient is actually in front of you), but not in the diagnostic image review process. It would probably make sense to ensure that the patient picture was available in the EMR, and that the EMR was available (in context of the patient) at the PACS client—that way, even non-PACS users would benefit.
This makes sense.
If we are going to certify EMR technology, HIE should be held to the same standard. Especially as more physicians turn to their HIE to provide basic EMR-like access to patient records (mostly because the HIE interface is better than their own EMR’s, the collaboration tools are better, and there is more of their patient’s data from more sources in the HIE).
A story of how computers fail to solve the problem when ineffective design and change management are used.